User talk:Tigersharke - Revision history

Tigersharke: /* task to replacing for better phrases of links */ improved.

2012-11-18T07:56:51Z

‎task to replacing for better phrases of links: improved.

2012-11-17T07:00:58Z

‎task to replacing for better phrases of links

2012-09-23T06:33:18Z

‎task to replacing for better phrases of links: :-) :-* :-)

2012-09-22T08:54:06Z

‎task to replacing for better phrases of links

2012-09-22T08:51:34Z

2012-09-17T07:57:25Z

2012-09-16T07:53:31Z

‎task to replacing for better phrases of links

2012-09-14T18:34:23Z

‎task to replacing for better phrases of links

2012-09-14T18:32:57Z

‎task to replacing for better phrases of links

2012-09-14T04:51:50Z

‎task to replacing for better phrases of links

@@ Line 98: / Line 98: @@
 ! phrase to replace
 |-
-| [[Installing Applications and Keeping PC-BSD® Updated]] [http://wiki.pcbsd.org/index.php?title=Installing_Applications_and_Keeping_PC-BSD%C2%AE_Updated&curid=221&diff=17429&oldid=17162]
-| here
 |-
 |}

@@ Line 98: / Line 98: @@
 ! phrase to replace
 |-
+| [[Installing Applications and Keeping PC-BSD® Updated]] [http://wiki.pcbsd.org/index.php?title=Installing_Applications_and_Keeping_PC-BSD%C2%AE_Updated&curid=221&diff=17429&oldid=17162]
+| here
 |-
 |}

@@ Line 90: / Line 90: @@
 Salve [[User:Tigersharke|Tigersharke]],
-which page or section might be the right one to collect (all) the not perfect named links, which should be replaced (in the "style" of the [[PC-BSD Wiki:Style Guidelines#Hypertext Links|Guideline for Hypertext Links]])?
+this section might be the right one to collect (all) the not perfect named links, which should be replaced (in the "style" of the [[PC-BSD Wiki:Style Guidelines#Hypertext Links|Guideline for Hypertext Links]]).
-Or could you (or [[User:Drulavigne|Drulavigne]] manage that, if I posting it here ( :-D ). ;-)
+You (or [[User:Drulavigne|Drulavigne]]) can manage that, if people are posting it here ( :-D ). ;-)
 {|
@@ Line 102: / Line 102: @@
 |-
 |}
 I am interested that people like you are are doing the replacement. Please (just) make the text (of the links) better. After that, please delete the row of the table above.
-…
+--[[User:Vater|Rg]]
-−
---[[User:Vater|Rg]] 11:32, 14 September 2012 (PDT)

@@ Line 107: / Line 107: @@
 --[[User:Vater|Rg]] 17:06, 12 September 2012 (PDT)
-It should be possible to do a site search for "here" or " here " which should uncover most of the ones needing adjustment.
+…
-−
---[[User:Tigersharke|Tigersharke]] 21:47, 12 September 2012 (PDT)
-−
-But it is not only "here". An other special example is "this blog post" (I am interested to have a place to list this kind of "problems", which I can't handle by my one.)
-−
-BTW: Do you mean a [http://wiki.pcbsd.org/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=here&fulltext=Search "normal" search for the word ''here'']?
-−
---[[User:Vater|Rg]] 05:07, 13 September 2012 (PDT)
-−
-Yes, that was what I had in mind, but I guess it doesn't work.. How about using the 'flat html' an a browser text search? That should do it, at least for 'here' but for the others, dunno- a quick skim (read)?  I had tried to clarify the intent of the adjustments for these "too generic/vague" link texts in the style guidelines (I added a second example i think).  Maybe add to the list of vague words to search for, along with 'here' we include 'this' and 'post' and 'link' and similar?
-−
---[[User:Tigersharke|Tigersharke]] 21:49, 13 September 2012 (PDT)
 I was using [[flat html]] (for my first search). Anyway!

@@ Line 98: / Line 98: @@
 ! phrase to replace
 |-
-| [[evilwm]]
-| "here"
 |-
 |}
 Thanks for your (conceivable) help. :-)
@@ Line 143: / Line 128: @@
 --[[User:Vater|Rg]] 11:32, 14 September 2012 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:57, 17 September 2012
Line 147:		Line 147:

	--[[User:Tigersharke\|Tigersharke]] 00:53, 16 September 2012 (PDT)		--[[User:Tigersharke\|Tigersharke]] 00:53, 16 September 2012 (PDT)
		+
		+
		+	BTW: I would love to use some of the methods employed on wikipedia- where editors may find things needing changing, and they simply add a "stub" to indicate what needs fixing. Unfortunately, here it seems that stubs are virtually the first thing removed in the first edit to the page following addition of the stub in the first place.
		+
		+	--[[User:Tigersharke\|Tigersharke]] 00:57, 17 September 2012 (PDT)

@@ Line 113: / Line 113: @@
 | "this blog post"
 |}
 Thanks for your (conceivable) help. :-)
@@ Line 139: / Line 143: @@
 --[[User:Vater|Rg]] 11:32, 14 September 2012 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:32, 14 September 2012
Line 131:		Line 131:

	--[[User:Tigersharke\|Tigersharke]] 21:49, 13 September 2012 (PDT)		--[[User:Tigersharke\|Tigersharke]] 21:49, 13 September 2012 (PDT)
		+
		+	I was using [[flat html]] (for my first search). Anyway!
		+
		+	I am interested that people like you are are doing the replacement. Please (just) make the text (of the links) better.
		+
		+	…
		+
		+	--[[User:Vater\|Rg]] 11:32, 14 September 2012 (PDT)