Difference between revisions of "Talk:Life Preserver/10.0"

From PC-BSD Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Questions: What would be needed for a Linux port and to support BTRFS?)
 
(Linux Port)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
At least introducing a system call abstraction layer.
 
At least introducing a system call abstraction layer.
  
 +
-
 +
I believe that Life Preserver heavily leverages ZFS at present, so one thing a Linux port would need is strong ZFS support- send/receive for sure and possibly more.  I am not the developer involved, however source should be available from the git repo.
  
 
== BTRFS Support ==
 
== BTRFS Support ==

Revision as of 00:40, 18 February 2014

Linux Port

What are the tasks or what would be needed to port Life Preserver to Linux? At least introducing a system call abstraction layer.

- I believe that Life Preserver heavily leverages ZFS at present, so one thing a Linux port would need is strong ZFS support- send/receive for sure and possibly more. I am not the developer involved, however source should be available from the git repo.

BTRFS Support

What are the tasks or what would be needed to support BTRFS in addition to ZFS? At least introducing a file-system call abstraction layer.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox